Material for speakers: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
(24 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
=Mu2e-II= | |||
Contributed paper for Snowmass22 | |||
<ref name=Byrum2022/>https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07569 | |||
[https://mu2e-docdb.fnal.gov/cgi-bin/sso/ShowDocument?docid=41871 Sample slides based on the Snowmass contributed paper] | |||
NUFACT2022 paper | |||
<ref name=Neuffer2023/>https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2022/conf/fermilab-conf-22-928-ad.pdf | |||
==References== | |||
<references> | |||
<ref name=Byrum2022> Byrum, K. et al., Mu2e-II: Muon to electron conversion with PIP-II, [https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07569]</ref> | |||
<ref name=Neuffer2023> Neuffer, D. et ai., A Pion-Production Target for Mu2e-II: Design and Prototype, Phys. Sci. Forum 2023 (NUFACT 2022 paper) [https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2022/conf/fermilab-conf-22-928-ad.pdf]</ref> | |||
</references> | |||
=Mu2e= | =Mu2e= | ||
[https://mu2e.fnal.gov/public/hep/results/index.shtml Mu2e public results and material for speakers] | [https://mu2e.fnal.gov/public/hep/results/index.shtml Mu2e public results and material for speakers] | ||
=Theory= | =Theory= | ||
We measure | |||
<math> | |||
\begin{equation} | |||
R_{\mu e} \equiv \frac{\Gamma(\mu^-N(A,Z)\to e^-N(A,Z)}{\Gamma(\mu^-N(A,Z)\to \nu_\mu N(A,Z-1)^*)}. | |||
\end{equation} | |||
</math> | |||
In the standard model, this is very small. On aluminum it is estimated to be | |||
<math> | |||
\begin{equation} | |||
R(\mu^-\hbox{Al}\to e^- \hbox{Al}) \sim 2\times10^{-52}\frac{\sin^2\theta_{13}}{0.15}. | |||
\end{equation} | |||
</math> | |||
<ref name=Marciano2008/> | |||
<div><ul> | <div><ul> | ||
Line 11: | Line 46: | ||
</ul> | </ul> | ||
=References= | ==References== | ||
[Following references not cited above: <ref name=Cirigliano2009/> | |||
<ref name=Marciano1977/>] | |||
<references> | |||
<ref name=Marciano2008> Marciano, William J. and Mori, Toshinori and Roney, J. Michael, Charged Lepton Flavor Violation Experiments, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 58 (2008) 315-341.</ref> | |||
<ref name=Cirigliano2009>[https://journals.aps.org/prd/abstract/10.1103/PhysRevD.80.013002 Vincenzo Cirigliano, Ryuichiro Kitano, Yasuhiro Okada, and Paula Tuzon, Phys. Rev. D 80, 013002 (2009)]</ref> | |||
<ref name=Marciano1977> Marciano, William J. and Sanda, A. I., Reaction <math>\mu^-+\hbox{Nucleus}\rightarrow e^-+\hbox{Nucleus}</math> in Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1512-1515.</ref> | |||
< | </references> | ||
=PIP-II accelerator= | =PIP-II accelerator= | ||
Line 62: | Line 106: | ||
electron spectrum from muon decays in orbit (DIOs). The red curves show the conversion electron spectrum for the | electron spectrum from muon decays in orbit (DIOs). The red curves show the conversion electron spectrum for the | ||
values of <math>R_{\mu e}</math> indicated in the legends. | values of <math>R_{\mu e}</math> indicated in the legends. | ||
In more detail: (left) Simulation of the energy distributions of electrons from conversion and the high energy tail of DIO's, for Mu2e. The assumption is <math>6.7\times 10^{17}</math> stopped muons and a conversion electron (CE) rate of <math> | In more detail: (left) Simulation of the energy distributions of electrons from conversion and the high energy tail of DIO's, for Mu2e. The assumption is <math>6.7\times 10^{17}</math> stopped muons and a conversion electron (CE) rate of <math>10^{-16}</math>. The electron energies are broadened by energy straggling in the stopping target and the Inner Proton Absorber (IPA), and by energy straggling and multiple scattering in the Tracker; | ||
(center) Simulation of the energy distributions of electrons from conversion and the high energy tail of DIO's, for Mu2e-II. The assumption is <math> | (center) Simulation of the energy distributions of electrons from conversion and the high energy tail of DIO's, for Mu2e-II. The assumption is <math>10^{19}</math> stopped muons and a CE rate of <math>10^{-17}</math>. The energy resolution is assumed to be the same as that expected for Mu2e. There is now a substantial overlap between the DIO background and the CE signal; | ||
(right) Simulation of the energy distributions of electrons from conversion and the high energy tail of DIO's, for Mu2e-II. The assumption is <math> | (right) Simulation of the energy distributions of electrons from conversion and the high energy tail of DIO's, for Mu2e-II. The assumption is <math>10^{19}</math> stopped muons and a CE rate of <math>10^{-17}</math>. The energy resolution is assumed to be the two times better than Mu2e (a goal of Mu2e-II). | ||
There is now much less overlap between the DIO background and the CE signal, compared to the center plot. | There is now much less overlap between the DIO background and the CE signal, compared to the center plot. | ||
]] </li> | ]] </li> | ||
Line 107: | Line 151: | ||
==References== | ==References== | ||
<li> [https://indico.cern.ch/event/1034469/contributions/4431744/] "A Novel Scintillator Detector for the Mu2e-II Experiment and a Muon Tomography Probe of the Interior of the Great Pyramid" </li> | <li> [https://indico.cern.ch/event/1034469/contributions/4431744/] "A Novel Scintillator Detector for the Mu2e-II Experiment and a Muon Tomography Probe of the Interior of the Great Pyramid" </li> | ||
=Trigger and Data Acquisition (TDAQ)= | |||
=Sensitivity= | =Sensitivity= | ||
Line 113: | Line 160: | ||
=References= | =References= | ||
<li>[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2110.07093.pdf] Muon to positron conversion (2021)</li> | |||
<li>[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.02073.pdf] Muon-ion collider for BNL (2021)</li> | <li>[https://arxiv.org/pdf/2107.02073.pdf] Muon-ion collider for BNL (2021)</li> | ||
<li>[https://www.snowmass21.org/docs/files/summaries/RF/SNOWMASS21-RF5_RF0_Frank_Porter-106.pdf] Mu2e-II Snowmass 22 Letter of Interest (2020)</li> | <li>[https://www.snowmass21.org/docs/files/summaries/RF/SNOWMASS21-RF5_RF0_Frank_Porter-106.pdf] Mu2e-II Snowmass 22 Letter of Interest (2020)</li> | ||
Line 120: | Line 168: | ||
<li>[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.06150.pdf] Muon colliders (2019)</li> | <li>[https://arxiv.org/pdf/1901.06150.pdf] Muon colliders (2019)</li> | ||
<li>[https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1802/1802.02599.pdf] Mu2e-II Expression of Interest (2018) </li> | <li>[https://arxiv.org/ftp/arxiv/papers/1802/1802.02599.pdf] Mu2e-II Expression of Interest (2018) </li> | ||
<li>[https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/annurev.nucl.58.110707.171126] Charged Lepton Flavor Violation Experiments (2008)</li> |
Latest revision as of 21:12, 26 September 2023
Mu2e-II
Contributed paper for Snowmass22
[1]https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.07569
Sample slides based on the Snowmass contributed paper
NUFACT2022 paper
[2]https://lss.fnal.gov/archive/2022/conf/fermilab-conf-22-928-ad.pdf
References
Mu2e
Mu2e public results and material for speakers
Theory
We measure
[math]\displaystyle{ \begin{equation} R_{\mu e} \equiv \frac{\Gamma(\mu^-N(A,Z)\to e^-N(A,Z)}{\Gamma(\mu^-N(A,Z)\to \nu_\mu N(A,Z-1)^*)}. \end{equation} }[/math] In the standard model, this is very small. On aluminum it is estimated to be [math]\displaystyle{ \begin{equation} R(\mu^-\hbox{Al}\to e^- \hbox{Al}) \sim 2\times10^{-52}\frac{\sin^2\theta_{13}}{0.15}. \end{equation} }[/math] [1]
References
[Following references not cited above: [2] [3]]
- ↑ Marciano, William J. and Mori, Toshinori and Roney, J. Michael, Charged Lepton Flavor Violation Experiments, Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, 58 (2008) 315-341.
- ↑ Vincenzo Cirigliano, Ryuichiro Kitano, Yasuhiro Okada, and Paula Tuzon, Phys. Rev. D 80, 013002 (2009)
- ↑ Marciano, William J. and Sanda, A. I., Reaction [math]\displaystyle{ \mu^-+\hbox{Nucleus}\rightarrow e^-+\hbox{Nucleus} }[/math] in Gauge Theories, Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 1512-1515.
PIP-II accelerator
References
Beamline
Production target
Production solenoid
Tracking
References
Calorimeter
Cosmic Ray Veto
The Mu2e-II Cosmic Ray Veto will need to cope with roughly a factor 3 higher instantaneous rates from accelerator compared with Mu2e as well as a factor of three higher live time (i.e., cosmic rays), because of the higher duty factor for Mu2e-II compared with Mu2e.